<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://learn.occ.utk.edu">
<channel>
 <title>Learn - OSS</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>50 OSS Alternatives List</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/176</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My student Debbie Lee sent me this list of 50 OSS alternatives&lt;/a&gt; to proprietary programs entitled &lt;a href=&quot;http://whdb.com/2008/the-top-50-proprietary-programs-that-drive-you-crazy-and-their-open-source-alternatives/&quot;&gt;The Top 50 Proprietary Programs that Drive You Crazy — and Their Open Source Alternatives&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:20:11 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looking in the Wrong Places</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/looking-in-the-wrong-places</link>
 <description>&lt;h2&gt;The Challenge&lt;/h2&gt;

      We in the field of educational technology need to pay more
attention to finding ways to provide students in teachers with the
tools that they need to increase identifiable learning outcomes. Too
often we can be pulled in by the sirens of cool toys or be convinced
that if only we could train teachers to understand how to use them,
students would learn better. I posit that teachers and students now
know quite well how to use computers to increase learning, but that
the computers they have do not provide even the simplest supports that
they need to do so.
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/27">Research</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:30:47 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Foundations for Open Source</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/154</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/575&quot;&gt;Couros&lt;/a&gt; linked
to &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.myvoipnews.org/2006/11/forty_foundatio.html&quot;&gt;Forty
Foundations for the future of Open Source.&lt;/a&gt; 
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:12:06 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>$100 Laptop Gets Closer</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/152</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The International Herald Tribune has a &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/19/features/design20.php&quot;&gt;story
&lt;/a&gt; about MIT&#039;s so-called &lt;a href=&quot;http://laptop.org/&quot;&gt;$100
Laptop&lt;/a&gt; initiative.  It&#039;s looking pretty cool, and I believe that
there&#039;s not much that kids (or most adults, really) need to do that
such a machine won&#039;t be able to do.  
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:51:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Open Source Course</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/151</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;David at &lt;a href=&quot;http://opencontent.org/&quot;&gt;OpenContent.org&lt;/a&gt; made
a &lt;a href=&quot;http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/284&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; about a
course at Berkeley called &lt;a
href=&quot;http://webcast.berkeley.edu/courses/archive.php?seriesid=1906978370&quot;&gt;InfoSys
296A-2 / Law276.8 Open Source Development and Distribution of Digital
Information: Technical, Economic, Social, and Legal Perspectives&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:30:38 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Linux in Indiana Schools</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/140</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A couple places have stories about Indiana moving not only to OSS applications, but even to Linux.  That&#039;s crazy.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schoolcio.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=186701271&quot;&gt;School CIO&lt;a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml?articleId=192201386&quot;&gt;this piece&lt;/a&gt;.  I mostly added this because some time ago I posted something about Linux in Indian schools and when I saw it just now I thought it was a typo.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/40">Software</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:15:48 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Linux in Indian Schools</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/135</link>
 <description>&lt;a
href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060829/tc_afp/indiaeconomytechnologycompanymicrosoftlinux&quot;&gt;This
Yahoo News story&lt;/a&gt; talks about India&#039;s communist-run Kerala state
and how the education minister said &quot;ideologically I support Linux and
Free and Open Operating Systems for IT enabled-education in schools.&quot;
I know I&#039;m a zealot and all, but I don&#039;t understand how someone
wouldn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;ideologically&lt;/em&gt; support Open Source Software (OSS).
If you could have software that was as good or better than its
competitors, wouldn&#039;t that be better than subsidizing any company,
especially one that has repeatedly been found guilty of using
non-competitive practices?  Isn&#039;t it better &lt;em&gt;ideologically&lt;/em&gt; to
use software that promotes learning (by allowing its source code to be
studied) and is available to all students, regardless of their ability
to pay for it?

&lt;p&gt;

The education minister didn&#039;t say that he would support banning
Microsoft&#039;s products as a zealot might, just that he&#039;d support the
idea of people using Linux too.  So I don&#039;t quite get what the big
deal is.

&lt;p&gt;The other thing about this story that I find bizarre is that the
author somehow sees a link between this story, which boils down to
&quot;Indian Commie says schools can use OSS if they want to,&quot; to a story
two weeks before when the same commies banned sales of Coke and Pepsi
because some (ostensibly whacko) environmental group found high levels
of pesticide in locally bottled Coke and Pepsi products.  I think
then, that the headline might read: &quot;Foreign Investors Beware:
Communist Indian State refuses to force its people to drink poison and
use Microsoft products.&quot;

&lt;p&gt;It is just a random Yahoo! News story, but it does strike me as
odd. 
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:51:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Webliographer Has Arrived</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/130</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://webliographer.com/webliographer/&quot;&gt;Webliographer&lt;/a&gt; is, to the best
of my knowledge, the first web-based application for managing and
sharing bookmarks.  The first usable version was in use in October of
1998.  It replaced my home page, which consisted primarily as a set of
categorized links.  I was especially proud of the fact that it tracked
the use of URLs, so when you clicked on a link a counter was updated
in the database and links that got more hits were promoted to the
front page of Webliographer&#039;s display.  Though I used, and still use,
Webliographer primarily for my own purposes an individual, my target
audience for Webliographer was primarily teachers who wanted kids to
use the web in their classrooms.
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/27">Research</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/40">Software</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:34:47 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Writely is rightly amazing</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/writely</link>
 <description>Wow. This post over at &lt;a title=&quot;Weblogged is cool&quot;
href=&quot;http://www.weblogg-ed.com/2005/11/17#a4266&quot;&gt;Weblogged&lt;/a&gt;
mentioned Writely in passing.  I hadn&#039;t heard of it, but now I have
and it&#039;s pretty cool.  The post said &quot;Who needs Word?&quot; which is
something that I&#039;ve been saying for about 10 years now, but for
entirely different reasons. 
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Peru Passes Law requiring OSS to be considered</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/75</link>
 <description>According to &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/associatedpress/feeds/ap/2005/09/28/ap2250213.html&quot;&gt;Forbes
Magazine&lt;/a&gt; Peru&#039;s congress unanimously passed a law that &quot;would
prohibit any public institution from purchasing computer equipment
that ties users to a particular type of software or &#039;in any manner
limits information autonomy.&#039; &quot;  It hasn&#039;t yet been signed into law.
&lt;p&gt;
Note that this doesn&#039;t require that the government use Open Source
Software (OSS), but just requires that it be considered.
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks to my student Rebecca Payne for bringing this article to my attention.</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:29:48 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft offers ESR a job</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/70</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://esr.ibiblio.org/index.php?p=208&quot;&gt;This story&lt;/a&gt; details how Microsoft tried to recuit Eric Raymond, one of the most public advocates for Open Source Software.  I found it on &lt;a href=&quot;http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/188&quot;&gt;David&#039;s blog.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:11:15 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More on Linux in Indiana</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/69</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://educationaltechnology.ca/couros/377&quot;&gt;Couros&lt;/a&gt; linked to this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStory.cfm?ArticleID=5837&amp;amp;page=1&quot;&gt;eSchool News article&lt;/a&gt; on the 1600 new desktop Linux computers in Indiana.  There was an &lt;a href=&quot;node/42&quot;&gt;earlier piece&lt;/a&gt; about this as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This quote is consistent with my &lt;a href=&quot;node/14&quot;&gt;&quot;no training&quot;&lt;/a&gt; idea.&lt;br /&gt;
Taylor said the state&#039;s open-source alternatives have become so similar to the proprietary models on which they are based--and with which teachers and students have become so comfortable--that teachers and students pick them up intuitively.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:18:16 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Moodle Course Data Manager Extension</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/68</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=28361&quot;&gt;This thread&lt;/a&gt; describes a module that allows one to adjust the due-dates of all (or a subset of) Moodle assignments at once.  This means that when you import a course and need to update every assignment&#039;s due-date you can do it from one page instead of havin g to go to every single assignment to fix them all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:01:10 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Five reasons NOT to use Linux</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/65</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS8124627492.html&quot;&gt;Five reasons NOT to use Linux&lt;/a&gt; is a silly one-sided piece about how great Linux is.  I think that the framing of the piece is interesting, but it&#039;s so clearly one-sided that it&#039;s easy to dismiss.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:31:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Moving to Moodle</title>
 <link>http://learn.occ.utk.edu/node/61</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There are a couple interesting threads on EDUCAUSE&#039;s CIO Listserv that talk about using and Moving to Moodle.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://listserv.educause.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0508&amp;amp;L=cio&amp;amp;T=0&amp;amp;F=&amp;amp;S=&amp;amp;P=3780&quot;&gt;This one&lt;/a&gt; talks about the decision to choose a Learning Management System (LMS) and asks about Blackboard, Jenzabar and WebCT.  Many of the responses talk about choosing Moodle.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://listserv.educause.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0508&amp;amp;L=cio&amp;amp;T=0&amp;amp;F=&amp;amp;S=&amp;amp;P=4639&quot;&gt;This one&lt;/a&gt; talks about the pains of switching from one LMS to another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Changing from one system to another is a very expensive proposition, not because of the costs of licensing the software and its care and feeding, but in the re-training of thousands of users.  In one post, someone says that if Blackboard doubled the $75K/year that it&#039;s costing this school now, he&#039;d probably keep paying it, as the current price is half what he&#039;s currentlly paying Microsoft and provides similar fractions for lots of other very expensive stuff.  That&#039;s all true, but the fact that once you&#039;ve gone with a proprietary system you&#039;re forever beholden to their whims is what I get from this line of reasoning.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/30"> News</category>
 <category domain="http://learn.occ.utk.edu/taxonomy/term/26">OSS</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:05:24 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
